Many native customary rights (NCR) land-owners are wary of the state government's
Konsep Baru (New Concept) of developing NCR land as plantations on a joint venture
with private investors.
"The land-owners feel they are vulnerable as they cannot see their interests
being tangible as the land itself as they would perceive their role now as labourers
or paid workers on their own land," Orang Ulu lawyer and politician Baru
Bian said yesterday.
In a paper on 'The Development of Native Customary Land in Sarawak and the
Laws Relating Thereto' presented at the national conference on 'Legal and Commercial
Implications of the Proposed Amendments to the National Land Code' in Kuala
Lumpur, Baru said that 'the surrendering of their rights over the land in favour
of a shareholding in the investment company invoke uncertainty and fear of losing
their pesaka or heirloom to the foreigner.'
The rural communities had real concerns over major shifts in their status from
landowners to workers or minor shareholders in plantation companies, he added.
"Others would say that this is a matter of attitudes and perception. The
social and cultural background of the landowners greatly influenced their attitudes
and perception to a certain extent, are true as many of the landowners want
to continue their old ways of living and traditional methods of farming."
He cited the problems with the new concept of implementing NCR land in Kanowit,
Kapit Division and Ulu Teru, Baram in Miri Division.
Political decisions
"The natives have been pressured into participation without understanding,
through a psychology of consensus based on compliance with decisions made by
local politicians that by-passed traditional Iban institutions of randau (participatory
dialogue), ignore the cultural attachment of Iban communities as the thesis
of their livelihood, selective patronage by Iban politicians with certain community
leaders, all of which contribute to conflicts between land-owners and government-approved
private developers and managing agents."
Sarawak has a big land mass, about 125,000 sq km, equal to Peninsular Malaysia
minus Perlis, with a current population of 2.5 million.
But much of its land mass is subject to the constraints of poor soil and high
terrain. Land suitable for agriculture is estimated at 3.5 million hectares
or nearly 30 per cent of the land mass. Of this, it is estimated 1.5 million
hectares are NCR land.
The state government has embarked on large-scale land development on estate
or plantation basis, mainly for oil palm, and has three principal agencies to
spearhead that development - Sarawak Land Development Board (SLDB) set up in
1972 and corporatised in 1991 through Sarawak Plantation Services Sdn Bhd; Sarawak
Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Authority (Salcra) set up four years later;
and Sarawak Land Custody and Development Authority (LCDA) set up in 1981.
SLDB is aggressively embarking on joint ventures. Salcra is empowered to develop
all categories of land but priority is given to the development of NCR land.
Baru noted that "Salcra has adopted the in-situ development approach in
planning, implementing and managing its development projects in efforts to uplift
the living standard of the farming communities."
By the end of 1992, the total area developed by the Salcra totaled 22,153 hectares,
consisting of 16,804 hectares of oil palm, 4052 hectares for cocoa, 1053 hectares
for rubber, 190 hectares for tea and 54 hectares coffee.
'Land Bank' concept
On LCDA, Baru said its objective is to enhance the state government's effort
on land development.
"Its primary role is to facilitate the development of all categories of
lands for agriculture, inclusive of NCR land for commercial ventures, irrespective
of its location once it is declared a development area."
The 'Land Bank' concept came into being where the authority identifies rural
land and avail it for development on a participational concept involving investors
and landowners.
Emphasis of its land development covers urban development and re-development,
agricultural plantation, tourism and socio-economic programmes.
It has very wide powers where the authority can dispose the land in any manner
it so desires.
Baru said it is uncertain as to why NCR has to be included under this scheme
when Salcra had already been empowered to deal with NCR development.
Consequently, he posed several questions: Has the scheme under Salcra been
a failure in achieving what the government intended to achieve in the first
place?
Or is it because the natives, at the end of the day, will eventually have their
ownership recognised and legalised by the issuance of formal titles under Salcra
and, therefore, not totally desired by some people in the government?
Is it possible that there is real fear if NCR land are developed under Salcra
and given title that huge area of state land may diminish?
"In fact, Salcra's track record since its inception had been satisfactory
not only as a developer but as a custodian to NCR owners. Perhaps it was the
paradigm shift into the Konsep Baru that would give us a possible reason,"
said the lawyer who is also handling numerous NCR land claims against the government.
No clear guideline
Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud told the state legislative assembly in 1991
that under the New Concept, about 400,000 hectares of NCR land had been developed
so far.
The concept is a joint-venture model where either LCDA or SLDB holds the NCR
land-owners' interests in trust for them and, in turn, the agency would form
a joint-venture company (JVC) with a well-established private company approved
by the government.
The JVC equity structure in terms of shares would be 60 per cent to the investor,
30 per cent for the landowners (held by the agency in trust) and the government
through the said agency, would hold 10 per cent.
No individual land titles would be issued to the landowners but instead, a
title is issued to the JVC for a period of 60 years (two plantation cycles)
for an agreed value.
The monetary value generated by the use of the land will be used for two types
of investments: 30 percent equity in the JVC (long term investment) and as cash
for investment in unit trusts.
Baru commented, "there is no clear guideline as to what happen after the
end of the 60 years. It is recommended that the NCR land be sub-divided and
given titles to the respective owners. If there is a need to pursue further
joint-venture, it must be with the consent of the landowners." |